Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Saturday, 13 March 2010

Debate is Free: Election 2010

On Thursday night Debate is Free: Election 2010 took place at the Kelvin building at the University of Glasgow. All very exciting but now we fancy a bit of feedback on what you though of all the panellists and what was said on the night. To hear the podcast head here Once you are done post up your comments on what was said here or by email to debate@subcity.org

The questions were chosen by the audience, with the debate focusing on issues such as public faith in politics, immigration, higher education financing, and lowering the voter age.

Highlights include:

"The current government seems happy with a UK Border Agency which is endemically racist" - Patrick Harvie

"Surely the fact that at 16 years of age you are liable for taxation is the single most important point? You should not be taxed if you are not allowed to vote" - Tommy Sheridan

"One of the great scandals this year was that 141,118 people had the grades to go to university, and applied, and the places weren't there" - Ruth Davidson


You can see a selection of photos below thanks to Sean Anderson.











Tuesday, 19 January 2010

Pushing the boundary

Its one of the most ambitious projects ever undertaken by a programme on a student radio station, there are over 400 secondary schools, 21 universities , 46 colleges in Scotland and we are getting in contact with them all. Hundreds of thousands of young people across Scotland are going to be offered the chance to take part in a project thats the first of its kind in Scotland.


Debate is Free which airs only on Subcity radio at the University of Glasgow is working on a special edition of the show separate from its usual format. 2010 is a General Election year and thousands of young people will looking at the political parties on offer and wondering who to vote for. Some may never have voted either due to the fact they were too young or they have never felt the need to vote or politics leave just them cold.


Debate is Free aims to bring the debate in a way that young people will find accessible and can interact with in a way they want to.
The special edition of Debate is Free on March 11th, potentially just weeks before an election is called will bring a panel of six before a studio audience for 90 minutes to answer their questions and questions submitted by listeners. The debate will range from the topical, to party policy to anything the audience demand be answered. Nothing is barred anything can be put forward for the panel to answer. From the recession, to the war on terror, to youth issues and human rights, we will consider anything.


Anyone will be able to listen on our website www.subcity.org and comment on what they hear on the Debate is Free Facebook fan page or by using Twitter and the tag #debateisfree. We want this to be a test of social networking so please send invites to this event to all your facebook friends and tweet details and comments. You can apply to be part of the audience here or to email any potential questions or comments email debate@subcity.org.

You can follow debateisfree on Twitter and the Facebook fanpage for panellist updates.

Sunday, 1 November 2009

Upcoming guests

Here is the list or our upcoming guests over the next wee while so you can get your questions and comments in. Please note a date for airing for all the interviews have not yet been confirmed.


Jim Murphy- Secretary of State for Scotland
Iain Gray- Scottish Labour Leader
Annabel Goldie- Scottish Conservative Leader
Tavish Scott- Scottish Liberal Democrats Leader
Shami Chakrabarti- Director of Liberty
Vince Cable- Liberal Democrat Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer

Keep your comments coming in!

Saturday, 26 September 2009

The big file-sharing hoo-ha

A lot has happened in the world of media piracy since our interview with the Swedish Pirate Party's MEP Christian Engstrom. First the music world seems to be in a state of civil war at the moment with multiple factions disagreeing upon what should happen to file-sharers once they are caught illegally downloading and sharing music. On one side you have artists such as Lily Allen and Gary Barlow supporting the recent government proposals to fine and ban persistent file-sharers from the Internet. They argue that filesharing is destroying British music and stops young bands making it in a competitive industry.

While on the other, you have Billy Bragg and Ed O'Brien of Radiohead condemning the proposals. They worry that they run the risk of alienating their fan-base with the high profile law suits that would surely follow and which have already damaged several bands reputations in the eyes of their fans after past cases. Metallica are a band who are often spoke of in hissing tones after the Napster case in 2001 which some argue they have never recovered from.

To add to the fray, three music groups decided to weigh in on the action earlier this month when the government announced it's plans in the Digital Britain report which originally came out in June 2009 with an added consultation dedicated to the file-sharing dilemma that was released in August. The Featured Artists Coalition along with the British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors and the Music Producers Guild all issued a joint press release stating that they "vehemently oppose" the proposals to punish file-sharers. A big turn around from the music industry's previous stance however it was not a sentiment shared by the record labels themselves who along with the film industry and trade union organisation the Creative Coalition Campaign welcomed the Digital Britain's consultation suggestions with open arms.

In the end a meeting was arranged between the artists and they came to an agreement that perhaps it was best to simply slow down serial music file-sharers Internet connection rather than disconnect them from the Internet. However there is still some unease amongst music artists that even this toned down suggestion would still have a detrimental effect on them.

Internet Service Providers have also been wary of the proposals as it would mean added work for them policing their networks and loss of revenues as they would have to cut off their own customers as well as the cost of catching file-sharers. And no one wants to risk their bread and butter. Talk Talk shared the worry of many digital rights campaigners, that cutting people off from the Internet would breach human rights legislation as well as open them up to law suits in the future as file-sharers fought back.


Although if one loser of the week had to be chosen it had to be Lily Allen as she didn't exactly come out the argument shining after it was revealed she was doing exactly what she was demanding be shut down - sharing other artist's music without permission on her website. File-sharing campaigners reacted with glee at the revelation that Allen was sharing mix tapes on her site with her own songs as well as other artists material many of whom where not associated with Allen's own record label EMI. Lily Allen has since announced she intends to give up making music in what can only be described as throwing a tantrum after being caught out. The offending mix tapes have also been taken down from the site, presumably after EMI executives had a heart attack at the possibility of getting what they wished for and a large bill from other rival record labels. A classic throwing stones in glass houses incident depending on where you stand on the whole argument

Its a tightrope for all, as the artists, record companies, film industry, ISP's and the file sharers all have a lot to lose as it all boils down to one thing: money. So the question to be asked now is. Is it time to legalise file-sharing in the UK? Should the UK have a system like Canada where personal use file-sharing is tolerated? Who knows but this fight looks set to rumble on and get uglier as time goes by.
 
http://www.wikio.co.uk